0
0
Donald Trump’s Rally in Wildwood, NJ
Donald Trump and his campaign faced an unusual demand when they sought to hold a rally on the beach in Wildwood, NJ. City officials required prepayment for security and clean-up costs before granting permission for the event. This decision marked a significant departure from Trump’s usual practice of avoiding such expenses, shedding light on the financial dynamics of his campaign efforts.
Payment Details
According to records obtained by NJ Advance Media through the Open Public Records Act, Trump’s campaign paid a total of $54,200 to Wildwood for the rally scheduled for May 11. The payment was split into two parts, with $54,000 submitted on April 16 and an additional $200 on April 24. Mayor Ernie Troiano confirmed that the city calculated the sum and presented an invoice to the campaign, emphasizing the need for upfront payment as a precondition for the event.
Historical Context
This would not be Trump’s first appearance in Wildwood, as he had visited the city previously in the past four years. The decision to require prepayment reflects a shift in the handling of campaign expenses, particularly in light of Trump’s track record of avoiding security costs associated with his events. The insistence on upfront payment signifies a departure from the norm and highlights the city’s efforts to ensure financial accountability.
While Trump’s rally may draw significant crowds, it remains to be seen how many attendees will be local residents. Notably, many of Trump’s supporters travel extensively to attend his events, indicating a dedicated following that transcends geographical boundaries. By demanding upfront payment, Wildwood set a precedent for other cities and towns faced with similar requests from the campaign, signaling a potential shift in financial arrangements for future events.
Overall, the decision to invoice Trump and his campaign for security and clean-up costs represents a significant development in the management of campaign expenses. By requiring prepayment, Wildwood asserted financial responsibility and challenged the conventional practices associated with hosting political events. This shift could have broader implications for future campaign events, prompting greater accountability and transparency in financial dealings.
Image/Photo credit: source url
