0
0
Hong Kong and US ETF Market Comparison: A Deep Dive
Recently, Hong Kong made headlines by approving Bitcoin and Ethereum Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), mirroring the success of similar funds in the United States. Despite this positive development, senior Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas raised doubts about the potential inflows these ETFs might attract, suggesting that the total value could be less than $1 billion.
Balchunas highlighted several key reasons for his skepticism, shedding light on the unique challenges facing the Hong Kong ETF market. One major concern is the relatively small size of the market, valued at around $50 billion, which pales in comparison to the massive US ETF industry. The dominance of three minor issuers — Bosera, China AMC, and Harvest — in the Hong Kong market, without the participation of major players like BlackRock, further complicates the landscape. This limited competition could potentially stifle growth and innovation in the ETF space, hindering the uptake of new products like Bitcoin and Ethereum funds.
Moreover, accessibility is a critical issue in the Hong Kong market, with Chinese investors unable to easily access these ETFs for official investment. This restriction not only narrows the potential investor base but also limits the liquidity and efficiency of the market, leading to wider spreads and premium discounts. In contrast, the US ETF market boasts a more robust ecosystem, with lower fees (typically 1-2%) and greater participation from institutional investors, ensuring smoother operations and healthier competition.
Turning our attention to the United States, Balchunas shared data on the performance of popular ETFs, such as Fidelity’s FBTC and BlackRock IBIT. While FBTC saw its inflow streak come to a halt after 63 consecutive days without any new investments, there were no outflows either, indicating stable investor confidence. On the other hand, BlackRock IBIT continues to perform strongly, maintaining an active streak for 64 days and positioning itself to compete with top-ranking ETFs like USMV.
In conclusion, the divergent paths of the Hong Kong and US ETF markets reflect the unique challenges and opportunities facing each region. While Hong Kong’s approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs marks a significant milestone, the road ahead may be fraught with obstacles, including limited market size, access issues, and higher fees. In contrast, the US market’s established infrastructure, lower costs, and diverse investor base position it as a leader in the global ETF space, offering valuable insights for industry stakeholders and potential investors.
Image/Photo credit: source url
