0
0
The Potential Impact of an Unrelated Case on Binance’s Defense
Recently, Binance and related parties made a strategic move to enhance their defense against the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) by referring to a government document from an unrelated case. In this independent case involving Mango Markets exploiter Abraham Eisenberg, the US government’s stance on the classification of stablecoin USDC as a security became a focal point. This development holds potential implications for Binance’s ongoing legal battle with the SEC.
The Government’s Position on USDC
Key to Binance’s defense strategy is a paragraph from the unrelated case where US government attorney Damian Williams asserted that there is no factual basis to treat USDC as a security. Williams pointed out that the nature of USDC, being pegged to the US dollar, does not lead token holders to anticipate profits. This argument challenges the idea of categorizing MGNO Perpetuals, which derive their value from USDC, as a mixed swap.
The argument put forth in the Eisenberg case, while successful in aiding government prosecutors, could have broader implications beyond the specific trial. By establishing a precedent regarding USDC’s classification, this argument could potentially serve as a defense for other entities facing securities-related charges, including Binance.
Potential Limitations of the Argument
Despite its significance, the applicability of the USDC-centered argument may have constraints. The SEC’s accusations against Binance encompass a range of securities violations, each tied to different offerings. Furthermore, the referenced document is directly relevant only to the civil securities suit involving Binance Holdings Limited, former CEO Changpeng Zhao, and related entities, excluding criminal proceedings against Zhao.
While the argument from the Eisenberg case could offer support to defendants in various securities-related litigations, such as Coinbase, it should be noted that the circumstances of each case may vary. Notably, the SEC’s simultaneous pursuit of legal action against Coinbase and Binance, along with other exchanges like Kraken, underscores the broader regulatory landscape in which these entities operate.
Image/Photo credit: source url
