0
0
The Impact of the U.S. Regulatory Environment on Crypto: Insights from VanEck’s Matthew Sigel
The regulatory framework in the United States is proving to be a significant obstacle for institutions seeking to venture into the crypto space, according to VanEck’s Head of Digital Assets Research, Matthew Sigel. However, the upcoming presidential election could bring about a transformation in this landscape.
In a recent interview with Decrypt, Sigel noted that the Biden Administration is actively discouraging banks and brokers from engaging with digital assets through verbal and explicit directives. This coercive tactic, known as ‘jawboning,’ aims to dissuade involvement through persuasion rather than direct enforcement.
The Potential Impact of the Next Presidential Election
The outcome of the upcoming presidential election, featuring a showdown between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, holds the potential to significantly influence the cryptocurrency industry and wider sectors of the U.S. economy. Sigel speculates that a change in presidency, particularly a Biden defeat, could herald increased support and adoption of digital assets.
Expressing optimism about the industry’s future, Sigel highlighted the burgeoning bull run in Bitcoin, propelled by retail investor interest following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S. market.
Challenges in Establishing a Bitcoin ETF
VanEck’s early recognition of Bitcoin’s disruptive capabilities led the firm to pursue a Bitcoin ETF as a means for buyers to access Bitcoin exposure without direct ownership. Despite numerous attempts over the last decade, the Securities and Exchange Commission consistently rebuffed Bitcoin ETF applications, signaling regulatory hurdles.
While VanEck’s initial efforts in 2018 were unsuccessful, this year saw the approval of 10 spot Bitcoin ETFs by the SEC, including VanEck’s own “HODL” ETF. Sigel highlighted the firm’s diversification into various products, including tokens, equities, and the Bitcoin ETF to adapt to regulatory challenges.
Critiques of U.S. Regulatory Approach
Sigel, like many in the industry, criticized the SEC’s enforcement-centric regulatory stance, lamenting the lack of a clear framework for crypto assets. The SEC’s rigorous standards, coupled with vocal support from anti-crypto figures like Senator Elizabeth Warren, present ongoing challenges for firms eyeing crypto investments.
As attitudes towards digital assets evolve, Sigel foresees a shift among financial advisors who may reconsider Bitcoin’s inclusion in investment portfolios, potentially ushering in a new phase of growth in the market.
Image/Photo credit: source url
