0
0
Donald Trump’s Legal Defense
After the day’s court proceedings concluded, Donald Trump took the stand outside the courthouse and proceeded to undermine his own defense with his words.
Trump attempted to clarify his payments to Michael Cohen by stating:
This is a case that nobody desired to pursue, not even Alvin Bragg. At the eleventh hour, a decision was made to proceed. It’s a case that, if traced back, dates back many years, possibly even before 2015. This is a case involving bookkeeping, a minor matter in the eyes of the law contrasted with the rampant violent crimes being perpetuated outside as we engage in dialogue.
Trump went on to explain the nature of the payments as legal expenses, emphasizing they were never claimed as tax deductions. According to him, legal expenses were the designated term for such transactions in the financial records.
Refuting any association with construction activities, Trump classified the payments as legal expenditures for Cohen’s legal services, citing the broad range of individuals Cohen represented over the years.
The Legal Conundrum
It becomes evident from Trump’s statements that he orchestrated the labeling of Cohen’s payment as a legal expense, portraying it as a lawful activity. His defense rests on the argument that utilizing a lawyer’s services for any purpose automatically qualifies it as a legal expense in his understanding.
Trump’s defense strategy hinges on the technicality that the payment was documented solely as a legal expense due to space constraints and bookkeeping norms, leading him to deny any criminal intent behind the transaction.
However, Michael Cohen’s testimony has consistently supported the assertion that Trump’s primary motive was to conceal unfavorable information from the public eye. The payment to Cohen was construed as an illegal campaign contribution aimed at suppressing damaging revelations.
The Prosecution’s Perspective
Trump’s public statements during the trial may inadvertently provide the prosecution with additional evidence to bolster their case. By attempting to reframe a potentially criminal conspiracy as a routine legal procedure, Trump is treading on dangerous ground that could potentially lead to his conviction.
It is imperative for Trump to exercise caution and restraint in his public commentary during the trial, as his attempts to spin the narrative in his favor may inadvertently strengthen the prosecution’s case against him.
Image/Photo credit: source url
