0
0
Concerns Over Avian Influenza Spread in US Dairy Cows
Recently, growing unease has been observed among researchers worldwide regarding the proliferation of highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1) within US dairy cow populations. The virus’s continued infiltration into new herds and states has raised red flags, prompting several experts to express dissatisfaction with the limited sharing of information from the federal investigation by the US government. Of particular concern is the lack of genetic information made available regarding isolated viruses, a crucial aspect in understanding the outbreak.
Spread and Investigation
Currently, the US Department of Agriculture has documented the presence of the virus in 32 affected herds across eight states, namely Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, South Dakota, and Texas. While some cases can be linked to the movement of cattle between herds, the USDA has not disclosed whether all herds are connected in a single outbreak chain or if the virus has reinfected cows on multiple occasions. In Texas, the initial cases were associated with deceased wild birds, like pigeons, blackbirds, and grackles in proximity to dairy farms. Despite this, the USDA suggested that not all infections are directly linked to the Texas incidents.
The USDA acknowledged the transmission of the virus via cattle movements, indicating cow-to-cow spread. However, the precise method of transmission remains unclear, as even symptomatic cows exhibit minimal respiratory manifestations. Contaminated milking equipment is suspected to be a primary vector for virus transmission among cows.
Implications and Unknowns
The New York Times reported a significant development where an infected herd in North Carolina displayed no symptoms of H5N1, suggesting the potential silent spread of the virus in other asymptomatic herds across different states. The USDA, in its most recent FAQ document, recommended testing for H5N1 in herds exhibiting clinical indications like lethargy, fever, reduced milk production, and loose stools. Despite this guidance, asymptomatic cow testing has commenced, underscoring the complexity and uncertainty in tracking the virus.
Moreover, there are concerns surrounding the virus’s spread back into birds on nearby poultry farms from infected dairy farms. The mechanism behind this cross-species transmission remains a mystery, fueling fears about the virus’s adaptation to infect mammals and its potential threats to humans.
Genetic Sequences and Transparency
International experts have criticized the USDA for its limited sharing of genetic data essential for tracking viral evolution and assessing potential risks to humans. While the USDA claims no mutations identified yet would enhance human-to-human transmission, the release of more genetic sequences was demanded to allow rapid and transparent updates. Launching 239 genetic sequences on GISAID, the USDA aims to enhance transparency and scientific access to critical information promptly.
Dr. Rosemary Sifford, the USDA’s chief veterinarian, highlighted the agency’s commitment to generating more data despite being in the early stages of investigation. Notwithstanding the uncertainties, both the USDA and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention maintain low public risk levels. Nonetheless, workers in direct contact with infected animals are advised to take necessary precautions to prevent potential exposure.
Mitigation Efforts and Assurance
Although H5N1 is lethal to birds, its impact on cows is relatively benign, with rare or no fatalities reported. While infected milk poses risks due to high virus content, the FDA ensures that pasteurization effectively eliminates the virus, affirming the safety of the milk supply. Citing the proven effectiveness of pasteurization against various pathogens, including influenza, the FDA remains confident in averting any contamination risks. Additional data verification is advocated by experts to bolster this assertion amid the ongoing outbreak.
Image/Photo credit: source url
