Sunak’s Plan to Pay Illegal Migrants £3,000 to Move

0 0
Read Time:1 Minute

Rishi Sunak and Immigration Policy

Son of Indian immigrants, Rishi Sunak embarked on a journey to become a successful businessman, transitioning into a Member of Parliament, with aspirations to lead the Conservative Party and the UK as Prime Minister. His rise to power is indeed an intriguing tale that garners support from many.

However, upon assuming the leadership role in the United Kingdom, it became evident that Sunak lacked the intent or capability to adhere to conservative principles and guide his nation through challenging times. His tenure is marked by indecisiveness, resorting to half-hearted measures and betraying fellow conservatives such as Suella Braverman and Lee Anderson when they showcase true conservative values.

One glaring issue during Sunak’s premiership is his unfulfilled promise to ‘stop the boats,’ referring to the influx of illegal migrants arriving in the UK via small boats. Despite heavy political investment in this agenda, results remain futile. To address the mounting backlog of rejected asylum seekers, the government is considering offering these individuals up to 3,000 pounds each to voluntarily relocate to Rwanda.

Reuters reported that this initiative aims to alleviate the burden of rejected applicants, categorized as illegal immigrants, by providing financial incentives for relocation. Notably, this approach differs from the previous plan of forcibly deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda, which was deemed illegal by the UK Supreme Court.

With thousands of rejected asylum seekers residing in the UK, the government faces challenges in repatriation due to legal restrictions barring returns to unstable or human rights-violating regions. Kevin Hollinrake, a junior business minister, highlighted the high costs associated with accommodating failed asylum seekers in the UK and justified the relocation offer as a cost-effective alternative.

Sunak is pursuing legislative measures in parliament to solidify Rwanda’s classification as a ‘safe country’ for asylum seekers, aiming to circumvent future legal impediments. Despite the controversial nature of incentivizing voluntary relocation, the government perceives it as a pragmatic solution amid ongoing immigration challenges.

Image/Photo credit: source url

About Post Author

Chris Jones

Hey there! 👋 I'm Chris, 34 yo from Toronto (CA), I'm a journalist with a PhD in journalism and mass communication. For 5 years, I worked for some local publications as an envoy and reporter. Today, I work as 'content publisher' for InformOverload. 📰🌐 Passionate about global news, I cover a wide range of topics including technology, business, healthcare, sports, finance, and more. If you want to know more or interact with me, visit my social channels, or send me a message.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %