0
0
Tesla Drivers Lose Attempt to Sue as a Class Over Driving Range Claims
Recent legal proceedings have uncovered a setback for Tesla drivers who have taken issue with the carmaker’s purportedly exaggerated driving ranges for its electric vehicles. The outcome sees these discontented drivers relegated to pursuing their grievances individually in arbitration, as per a recent federal court ruling.
The Root of the Issue
The genesis of this legal dispute stemmed from two lawsuits that arose subsequent to an investigative report conducted by Reuters last year, bringing to light Tesla’s consistent inflation of the advertised driving range of its electric vehicles. This misleading information led Tesla car owners to mistakenly believe that their vehicles were experiencing mechanical malfunctions when, in reality, the actual driving range fell far short of what was promised. Allegedly, Tesla even established a specialized “Diversion Team” to address these complaints and frequently canceled scheduled service appointments due to the inability to enhance the actual distance that Tesla vehicles could cover between charges.
Arbitration Agreement Implications
The crux of the legal matter lies in the arbitration agreements that each named plaintiff in the aforementioned lawsuits signed when purchasing their Teslas. The agreement explicitly dictates that any disputes arising from the relationship between customers and Tesla would be settled through arbitration under the administration of the American Arbitration Association, thereby precluding resolution through conventional judicial means.
Despite the drivers’ argument that the arbitration agreement was not legally enforceable based on the precedent set by the McGill v. Citibank case, where the California Supreme Court declared arbitration provisions invalid if they obstruct the plaintiff’s option to seek public injunctive relief, the court seems to favor Tesla. The court emphasized that the agreement did not preclude plaintiffs from pursuing public injunctive relief on an individual basis.
Potential Relief and Legal Path Forward
In essence, while the class action route may have been blocked by the arbitration agreement, individual Tesla drivers still have an avenue to address their concerns through arbitration. If successful, a driver could potentially secure an injunction that forces Tesla to rectify its practices, thereby benefiting the general public not just as a class action member but as part of a broader societal impact.
The legal machinery is in motion, with the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the California Unfair Competition Law (UCL), and the California False Advertising Law (FAL) forming the legal backbone for the drivers’ claims. The court has indicated that it is poised to adjudicate any need for public injunctive relief post-arbitration, potentially reshaping Tesla’s conduct in the future.
Ultimately, despite the setback of losing the class action status, individual Tesla drivers have not entirely lost their ability to seek redress for the perceived misrepresentation of driving ranges by the carmaker.
Image/Photo credit: source url
