Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Biden-Harris Administration Finalizes Ban on Asbestos

0 0
Read Time:2 Minute

The Environmental Protection Agency Finalizes Ban on Chrysotile Asbestos

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) made a significant move on Monday by finalizing a ban on the only form of asbestos still utilized in the United States, known as chrysotile asbestos. This prohibition was the culmination of years of effort.

Health Implications of Chrysotile Asbestos

The EPA highlights that white asbestos, or chrysotile asbestos, continues to be imported, processed, and employed in various industries within the US, including the creation of diaphragms for producing sodium hydroxide and chlorine, sheet gaskets, brake blocks, automotive brakes, and linings, among other friction products and gaskets. Exposure to this substance is documented to result in severe health issues such as lung cancer, mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, and laryngeal cancer. Annually, asbestos exposure is responsible for over 40,000 deaths in the US alone.

International Context and Historical Background

The ban enacted by the US EPA places the country among more than 50 other nations that have already implemented similar prohibitions on asbestos. Initial efforts to ban asbestos in the US date back to 1989 during the George H. W. Bush administration. However, a federal court invalidated the ban in 1991, undermining the EPA’s authority. In 2016, Congress passed amendments to enhance the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976, providing an opportunity to reintroduce an EPA ban on asbestos. Unfortunately, under the Trump administration, this did not materialize.

Trump Administration’s Stance on Asbestos

Former President Trump openly advocated for the use of asbestos, going so far as to declare it “100% safe” once applied. He attributed the resistance against asbestos to alleged mob influence, asserting that mob-affiliated companies were behind the opposition to its discontinuance. In 2018, a Russian asbestos firm began marketing asbestos products in the US featuring Trump’s image and an approval seal reading “Approved by Donald Trump, 45th President of the United States.” Russia has been a significant supplier of asbestos to the US, adding complexity to the regulation of this problematic substance.

See also
TikTok faces sale or nationwide ban

Future Challenges and Legislative Outlook

Considering the looming possibility of a Trump presidency, concerns arise that the ban on asbestos could be overturned. Consequently, there is a push for Congress to pass comprehensive legislation that would ban all types of asbestos outright. Senator Jeff Merkley emphasized the importance of further legislative action to safeguard public health.

Implications of EPA Ban and Transition Schedule

Under the newly finalized ban by the EPA, companies using chrysotile asbestos have a transition period to phase it out. While the immediate import of asbestos for the chlor-alkali industry will be prohibited, facilities utilizing asbestos diaphragms will have up to 12 years to switch to non-asbestos alternatives. Specific timelines are outlined for different asbestos-containing products, with different industries having varying phases to comply with the ban.

Image/Photo credit: source url

About Post Author

Chris Jones

Hey there! 👋 I'm Chris, 34 yo from Toronto (CA), I'm a journalist with a PhD in journalism and mass communication. For 5 years, I worked for some local publications as an envoy and reporter. Today, I work as 'content publisher' for InformOverload. 📰🌐 Passionate about global news, I cover a wide range of topics including technology, business, healthcare, sports, finance, and more. If you want to know more or interact with me, visit my social channels, or send me a message.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %